dog bytes

The protection of the animal and a law (the 105th October 1, 1973 law) about the management are the laws that it established about prevention such as the abuse of the animal.
It was revised (1999) after an interval of 26 years in December in 1999, and it was revised (2005) in June in 2005.

For revision by the 50th June 2, 2006 law.

I am as follows with the protection animal (I meet and hit it how) in this law.

When I say a cow in particular, a horse, a pig, noodles sheep, a goat, a dog, a cat, and a rabbit, a cock say, it is from a point of view called "the animal which adapted to the human being society highly" about 11 kinds of the duck, and it is not asked whether there "is it by legal handling in the occupation bottom of the identification person".
On the other hand, I can ask the vertebrate of less than amphibians and an invertebrate it only to offense of breakage even if it is the animal which a person occupies obviously even if it is killed and wounded the tropical fish which, for example, I bred under the present conditions that it is not applied the fundamental law to intentionally by the third person.

I kill and wound the protection animals mentioned above abusively, and penal regulations such as the "fine (44 lines of Clause 1s) equal to or less than penal servitude that is equal to or less than it in 1 or 1,000,000 yen" are established for a person I abuse it or abandoned to let you weaken abusively by feeding or stopping water supply, but do not prohibit casualties to a case to fall under emergency refuge in the criminal law again when they forbid that this does casualties "abusively" and do casualties for capture and homicide disposal or a case said to that I can hunt it and a fair purpose (cases to butcher a scientific study purpose and domestic animal for edible meat or hides) by the rule of other laws either.

I am abandoned by the self-centered irresponsible reason of the owner and do it when there are unhappy trifles brought into the public health center, and there is demand further reinforcement of the regulation, moving.

The specific animal in this law is an animal establishing it by a government ordinance as the animal that there is a threat that I add harm to human life, a body or property.

The breeding of the specific animal or the person whom you are going to keep establishes facilities and the other standards (the preparations for implantation / antiserum of the microchip) and, every animal individual to breed, must receive the permission of the metropolis and districts governor of the breeding area.

I shall do it, and, in form to respect a fundamental law about the prevention of the specific foreign creature which is an animal in the foreign uncooked food method, as for the homicide disposal, it is assumed that I ask the person who received breeding permission to be based on an outpatient creature method again for breeding by the method that does not inflict as possible the animal.